I would like to explain that is, by exaggerating the real situation; modifying the data, hiding the premise, someone lied to public. And by modifying the statistical data in order to support their political purpose is an abuse to victims.
Also the law enforcement, out of my expectation, do the same thing: "the media eagerly glommed on to this story, portraying crack dealing as one of the most profitable jods in America." (Page 93, para. 1, line 2), but the truth is not as simple as what we used to thought. Is it a lucrative business? Oh, yes, its organizing chart have no so much differences from the one of McDonald's. But the most profitable one? The author wouldn't buy this story. So, maybe the dramatic, luxury life of a drug dealer never exist beyond the imagination.